James Karas
Mrs Warren’s Profession by Bernard Shaw.
Directed by Eda Holmes
Mrs. Warren Nicole
Underhay
Vivie Warren Jennifer
Dzialoszynski
Frank Gardner Wade
Bogert-O’Brien
Sir George Crofts Thom
Marriott
Rev. Samuel Gardner Shawn
Wright
Praed Gray
Powell
Continues
in repertory at the Royal George Theatre,
*** (out of five)
Does Eda Holmes
wish that Mrs Warren’s Profession was written by Thornton Wilder instead
of Bernard Shaw?
Her production
of Shaw’s third play bears some remarkable resemblances to Our Town which has a
character called Stage Manager who tells us what is going on and participates
in the action.
Jennifer Dzialoszynski and Nicole Underhay. Photo: David Cooper
Holmes adds a
Prologue to Mrs Warren’s Profession which
she sets in 2016 in The New Lyric Gentlemen’s Club. Several members of the club
tell us that there will be a reading of Shaw’s play and after a few
introductory remarks the play as Shaw wrote it begins. The entire play is done
in the club but the actors do explain to us what the set as described by Shaw
is supposed to be.
The play is in
fact set in a cottage and a rectory garden in Surrey as well as chambers in
London and I am not sure what is added to our appreciation of it by placing it
in a posh gentlemen’s club that most of us cannot possibly relate to.
Mrs Warren’s Profession is
about the disgraceful working conditions for women in 19th century
England which forced many of them into prostitution. The word is never
mentioned and although we are given some information about the conditions that
forced Mrs. Warren to sell her body we see nothing in the least bit tawdry.
Mrs Warren may
have started as a desperate pretty girl doing tricks but she rose up the ladder
of the oldest profession into management and partnership on a multinational
scale. With her partner Sir George Crofts she has become wealthy and raised a
daughter who was sent to Oxford University, is living well and does not have a
clue about what her mother is doing.
Nicole Underhay
as Mrs. Warren is a self-assured, handsome, well-dressed woman who exudes
success and self-satisfaction. She has raised her daughter Vivie with all the
comforts that money can buy but kept her in the dark about everything,
including the name of her father. Mrs. Warren’s world comes crashing around her
when she is rejected by Vivie and Underhay gives a superb performance
especially in the final scene when she tries to defend her actions.
Jennifer
Dzialoszynski, dressed casually in slacks, is a free-spirited young woman who
is courted by the feckless Frank Gardner. Life is good until she finds out the
source of the funds for it. She rejects everything including her mother and
goes to work. Dzialoszynski displays Vivie’s strength and resolve convincingly
in a fine performance but the character she portrays is more a humourless,
puritanical prig than an example that any woman would particularly wish to
emulate.
Wade
Bogert-Obrien’s Frank Gardner and Shawn Wright’s Reverend Samuel Gardner are
portraits of useless men who are comical in their ineptness. But the Reverend,
who buys his sermons, and is a pillar of the community, is also a prime example
of its hypocrisy. Who is Vivie’s father?
The most
interesting man is Sir George Crofts played by Thom Marriott. The baronet is
prepared to use and abuse women with the self-delusion that he is providing decent
employment. The profits are good and neither he nor his partners are willing to
give them up. The imposing Crofts of Marriott is all outward politeness, the
epitome of hypocrisy, with a much darker side just below the skin. His defence
is that everybody is corrupt so why should he not do the same.
The splendidly
panelled interior of The New Lyric Club designed by Patrick Clark takes us away
from the idyllic setting of the cottage garden and the rectory garden. The
contrast between the English countryside and Mrs. Warren’s profession is more
potent than the contrast between a men’s club putting on the reading of a play
and the fate of women in the 19th century.
The acting is
done well as described except for the accents. The cast sounded as if they are
immigrants to England trying to speak with a respectable accent but falling
short of success much of the time.
At the end of
the play Holmes has the cast read out Shaw’s stage directions. Aside from
adding the prologue and reading of stage directions, Holmes does a good job.
The characters are well-defined, some of the humour comes through and the final
scene is excellent and does not require a reading of Shaw’s stage directions.
No comments:
Post a Comment