Reviewed by James Karas
Two years ago Judith Thompson brought home what Saddam Hussein, the Americans and the British have done to the people of Iraq. Her play Palace of the End consists of three monologues through which the incredible human suffering brought on the Iraqis is described with unerring accuracy and unbearable pain.
Thompson told the story through “An American Soldier” who happened to be a torturer at Abu Ghraib, “A British Microbiologist and Weapons Inspector” who tells stories of torture and deception and by “An Iraqi Mother” who was tortured unspeakably by Saddam Hussein’s security forces.
It was an unforgettable night at the theatre.
Now Ms Thompson is back with Such Creatures, a play that consists of two intertwined monologues and once again she provides riveting theatre.
In Such Creatures, Ms Thompson has chosen two disparate characters very far apart in age and milieu to tell their stories. In the end they have a great deal in common.
The first character is Blandy (brilliantly acted by Michaela Washburn), a 14-year old girl living in contemporary Toronto.
At first blush she appears like a rebellious, disobedient teenager, tough, mouthy and to be shunned. She is being raised by an aunt and has been thrown out of a number of schools. She is in a Special Education Centre and is the type of teenager you would expect to find in Youth Court. She belongs to a gang and that will prove to be her downfall.
Blandy is also highly intelligent. She played one of three Hamlets in school and is able to relate to the troubled prince. Love of Shakespeare and references to Hamlet and The Tempest form one of the unifying features of the two monologues.
Blandy’s real name is Bernadette and she can relate to the young French girl who saw a vision of the Virgin and became a saint. In fact Blandy watches the movie The Song of Bernadette every week with her grandmother. She considers school the equivalent of purgatory and wants to tell the Pope of her discovery. In other words, she is not an ordinary punk.
The gang members will form the impression that she has betrayed them and in the end Blandy will be severely beaten and thrown on the ground.
The other monologue is by Sorele (a superbly serene and controlled Maria Vacratsis), a middle-aged woman who is facing her second and probably last bout with cancer. Sorele is a survivor of a Nazi concentration camp and she retells her experiences there as a teenager forty years later as she is approaching death.
In one of Ms Thompson’s piercing touches of irony, Sorele played Miranda in Shakespeare’s The Tempest and she has vivid memories of it. Shortly after that she was rounded up by the Nazis and sent to Auschwitz. She worked in a munitions factory making gun powder. She and her friends collect explosives spoonful by spoonful, enough to blow up a crematorium.
The two monologues are interwoven and aside from the Shakespearean connection the experiences of Blandy and Sorele have amazing connections. Sorele was at Auschwitz in 1945 and she is recalling her experiences in 1985 while Blandy tells her story in 2010. Standing up to a gang as opposed to the Nazis may seem far-fetched but for the individuals involved the result may not be all that disproportionate.
In the end when Blandy is on the ground after being pummelled senseless, she is lifted and comforted by Sorele and the two separate lives are united.
The play was commissioned by Nightswimming which describes itself as “one of Canada’s leading creators of new works of theatre, dance and music.”
Brian Quirt directs the production. He attempts to use as much of the stage and balcony of the small theatre as possible. When Sorele first appears she is in the audience, a few rows from the stage. The people in the upper rows were looking at her back and those in front of her had to strain their necks to see her or just listened to her. It is a minor hitch in a well done production.
The final result is literate, intelligent and brilliant theatre.
______
Such Creatures by Judith Thompson ran until February 6, 2010 at Theatre Passe Muraille Backspace, 16 Ryerson Ave Toronto, ON M5T 2P3. http://passemuraille.on.ca/
Tel. 416 504-7529
Friday, February 12, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
POPERA PLUS! FEATURES VOCAL TALENT AND OPERA FAVOURITES IN HAMILTON

Opera Hamilton is alive and kicking and celebrating its 30th anniversary season. It staged Die Fledermaus last October and will put on La Boheme in April. In between it put on Popera Plus!, a potpourri of favourite pieces from operas. It is a concert of familiar and not-so-familiar pieces that are no doubt intended to grab people and convince them to go to the opera more often.
The concert featured Greek-Canadian mezzo-soprano Ariana Chris, Canadian-Italian-American soprano Gianna Corbisiero, American tenor Richard Troxell and Welsh baritone Jason Howard. The Opera Hamilton Chorus was augmented by the McMaster University Choir and The Hamilton Philharmonic Orchestra was conducted by David Speers.
The programme consisted of 18 operatic excerpts that were performed in a little over two hours. There were three orchestral pieces and the rest were arias and duets, some with the chorus. Speers did not venture into trios or quartets.
Ms Chris sang “Nobles seigneurs, salut!” from Meyerbeer’s Les Huguenots. A rather cocky page delivers a message from his royal lady to an assembly of nobles. Ms Chris did not just carry the vocal line with ease but also captured the braggadocio of the page as he praises his employer.
She also sang two wonderful duets that gave her some opportunity to display both vocal dexterity and acting ability albeit in the limited setting of a concert performance.
The first duet was “Dunque io son” from Rossini’s The Barber of Seville where the clever Rosina shows Figaro that she can outwit him if need be. Howard is the match-making Figaro who suggests that Rosina send a letter to her prospective lover. The demure and shy Rosina immediately produces a letter. Some comic business and vocal charm resulted in a wonderfully done piece.
Ms Chris also sang the final scene of Carmen with Troxell as Don José. This is the dramatic end of the opera where Carmen rejects the final desperate pleas of Don José and he stabs her to death. Both sang well and again managed to bring the atmosphere of the scene with a few gestures.
Howard’s big moment came with his singing of “Credo” from Verdi’s Otello. This is Iago’s declaration of the absolute evil that lies in him. He is proud and defiant in his declaration and Howard brings out the drama and horror of his statement with power and vocal conviction. He also sings “Nemico della Patria” the aria of the corrupt Gerard from Andrea Chenier.
Ms Corbisiero got two lovely arias: “Io son l’umile ancella” from Cilea’s Adriana Lecouvreur and “Sola, perduta, abbandonata” from Puccini’s Manon Lescaut. She has a lovely voice and bearing but she did not always enunciate properly.
Troxell’s big moments were provided by “Lenski’s Aria” from Eugene Onegin and “Ah, leve toi, soleil” from Gounod’s Romeo et Juliette. Unlike the evil Howard, Troxell is the distraught lover in both arias and he hits the high notes and displays the passion that goes with the territory.
The results from the combined chorus were not as happy. What they gained in size they lost in vocal quality. They sang the “Soldiers’ Chorus” from Gounod’s Faust and their defects were not terribly evident. When they got to “Regina Coeli” from Cavalleria Rusticana they didn’t seem to be all on the same page. They also sang the indestructible “Va, Pensiero” from Nabucco and they managed to sound better but that may be more Verdi than them.
Listening to an evening of excerpts is like going to a fine restaurant and being served a mouthful from each item on the menu. You will not go hungry by the end of the night but you will not have tasted anything to the fullest.
The concert format has another disadvantage. The singers are left mostly to their own devices. They have no sets, no costumes, little freedom of movement and must jump from one role to the next in quick succession. Some handle the change better than others. When two singers are put side by side with shoulders touching there is very little leeway for moving a hand let alone making any pronounced gesture.
That’s what happened to Troxell and Howard when they sang “Au fond du temple saint” from Les Pecheurs des Perles by Bizet. At one point Howard did not know what to do with his hand and absent-mindedly (one hopes) stuck it in his pocket.
Nevertheless whatever issues there may be with the format and the performances the audience loved it and gave them a standing ovation. No doubt, that was the point of the programme all along.
_____
Popera Plus! was performed on January 28 and 30, 2010 at The Great Hall, Hamilton Place, Hamilton, Ontario. http://www.operahamilton.ca/ Tel. 905 527-7627
The concert featured Greek-Canadian mezzo-soprano Ariana Chris, Canadian-Italian-American soprano Gianna Corbisiero, American tenor Richard Troxell and Welsh baritone Jason Howard. The Opera Hamilton Chorus was augmented by the McMaster University Choir and The Hamilton Philharmonic Orchestra was conducted by David Speers.
The programme consisted of 18 operatic excerpts that were performed in a little over two hours. There were three orchestral pieces and the rest were arias and duets, some with the chorus. Speers did not venture into trios or quartets.
Ms Chris sang “Nobles seigneurs, salut!” from Meyerbeer’s Les Huguenots. A rather cocky page delivers a message from his royal lady to an assembly of nobles. Ms Chris did not just carry the vocal line with ease but also captured the braggadocio of the page as he praises his employer.
She also sang two wonderful duets that gave her some opportunity to display both vocal dexterity and acting ability albeit in the limited setting of a concert performance.
The first duet was “Dunque io son” from Rossini’s The Barber of Seville where the clever Rosina shows Figaro that she can outwit him if need be. Howard is the match-making Figaro who suggests that Rosina send a letter to her prospective lover. The demure and shy Rosina immediately produces a letter. Some comic business and vocal charm resulted in a wonderfully done piece.
Ms Chris also sang the final scene of Carmen with Troxell as Don José. This is the dramatic end of the opera where Carmen rejects the final desperate pleas of Don José and he stabs her to death. Both sang well and again managed to bring the atmosphere of the scene with a few gestures.
Howard’s big moment came with his singing of “Credo” from Verdi’s Otello. This is Iago’s declaration of the absolute evil that lies in him. He is proud and defiant in his declaration and Howard brings out the drama and horror of his statement with power and vocal conviction. He also sings “Nemico della Patria” the aria of the corrupt Gerard from Andrea Chenier.
Ms Corbisiero got two lovely arias: “Io son l’umile ancella” from Cilea’s Adriana Lecouvreur and “Sola, perduta, abbandonata” from Puccini’s Manon Lescaut. She has a lovely voice and bearing but she did not always enunciate properly.
Troxell’s big moments were provided by “Lenski’s Aria” from Eugene Onegin and “Ah, leve toi, soleil” from Gounod’s Romeo et Juliette. Unlike the evil Howard, Troxell is the distraught lover in both arias and he hits the high notes and displays the passion that goes with the territory.
The results from the combined chorus were not as happy. What they gained in size they lost in vocal quality. They sang the “Soldiers’ Chorus” from Gounod’s Faust and their defects were not terribly evident. When they got to “Regina Coeli” from Cavalleria Rusticana they didn’t seem to be all on the same page. They also sang the indestructible “Va, Pensiero” from Nabucco and they managed to sound better but that may be more Verdi than them.
Listening to an evening of excerpts is like going to a fine restaurant and being served a mouthful from each item on the menu. You will not go hungry by the end of the night but you will not have tasted anything to the fullest.
The concert format has another disadvantage. The singers are left mostly to their own devices. They have no sets, no costumes, little freedom of movement and must jump from one role to the next in quick succession. Some handle the change better than others. When two singers are put side by side with shoulders touching there is very little leeway for moving a hand let alone making any pronounced gesture.
That’s what happened to Troxell and Howard when they sang “Au fond du temple saint” from Les Pecheurs des Perles by Bizet. At one point Howard did not know what to do with his hand and absent-mindedly (one hopes) stuck it in his pocket.
Nevertheless whatever issues there may be with the format and the performances the audience loved it and gave them a standing ovation. No doubt, that was the point of the programme all along.
_____
Popera Plus! was performed on January 28 and 30, 2010 at The Great Hall, Hamilton Place, Hamilton, Ontario. http://www.operahamilton.ca/ Tel. 905 527-7627
Friday, February 5, 2010
COURAGEOUS - FAULTS WIPE OUT VIRTUES OF NEW CANADIAN PLAY
Patrick Galligan and Tom Barnett. Photography by Cylla von TiedemannMichael Healy’s new play Courageous opened on January 6, 2010 at the Tarragon Theatre. It has many virtues and one wishes one could write about them only and ignore the play’s faults. Unfortunately the latter are too awful to ignore and almost outweigh the good parts.
In the beginning we hear the Canadian version of Woody Guthrie’s “This Land is Your Land” with Bonavista and Vancouver Island replacing for California and New York Island. No matter because it sets the tone for a Canadian event. Good. On the stage we see quotations from Northrop Frye, Isaiah Berlin and Michael Ignatieff. That sets the tone for pretty serious stuff and anticipation is built for intelligent and perhaps witty theatre.
The play opens in the office of Tom (Tom Barnett), a Justice of the Peace who performs civil marriages and we meet a young couple who are about to be married. They are Todd (Brandon McGibbon) and Tammy (Erin MacKinnon). Tammy is arguing very vociferously with her friend and witness Lisa (Melissa MacPherson). The argument is centered on the fact that Lisa “blew” Todd. The latter is wearing a baseball cap sideways; he is unshaven and unkempt and is wearing shorts because that was the only thing that was clean.
Todd forgot to inform the second witness to show up for the ceremony and they are forced to induct a bystander called Arthur (Maurice Dean Wint) to perform that function. Without belabouring the point, these people can best be described as white trash.
Brian (Pat Galligan), a self-righteous and aggressive lawyer charges onto to the scene and asks that his marriage ceremony be performed immediately because he has a luncheon appointment with a client. Tom refuses to perform the ceremony because he disapproves of gay marriages. He is a devout Catholic who is also openly gay. In other words he belongs to a church that does not want him. A nice bit of irony.
Brian files a complaint against Tom with the Human Rights Tribunal and the two face off in the Tribunal’s waiting room just before the hearing. A lengthy Shavian discussion follows about gay rights, the right to refuse to perform a civil ceremony on the grounds of personal beliefs etc. It has some highly entertaining moments.
That is the first act. In Act II we meet the trashy trio again. The whole tenor of the play changes. Todd becomes a narrator and commentator as well as a character. As narrator he has some pretensions to intelligence. The incongruities between the first and second parts of the play are painful. We can treat them as two separate plays with some of the characters crossing over into the second play but that would not help the situation at all.
Arthur, who was a suave, meticulously-spoken wealthy Sudanese man in Act I returns as George, a Somali refugee who occupies an apartment next door to Todd and Tammy. Now we face the other side of “rights” – the rights of refugees to government support and the rights of the trashy couple to the same among other issues of newcomers versus locals.
The intelligent discussion of Act I becomes dreary sitcom jokes in Act II. Whatever connecting links there may be between the two acts, they are to be gleaned on close examination without adding one bit to the enjoyment to Act II.
Healy had a good idea for a one-act play and he took it as far as he could. For the second act he changed gears and could not even figure out how to end it. A character simply says “the end” when enough time has gone by and the audience can be released to go to their homes.
Despite the uneven quality of the play or plays, the actors do superior work. Tom Rooney plays Brian’s lover and would-be husband as well as an alcoholic employer called Pete in the second half. He is excellent. Very high marks to Galligan and McGibbon. Two very good roles for Wint and he excels in both. Tom Barnett is simply hilarious as the devout but gay Catholic who tries to be realistic about his position even when he is out in left field.
The kudos for good acting belong to the actors and no doubt the director gets a part of the praise for bringing it out. But a lot of blame must rest with Richard Rose. He should have insisted on more dramaturgical remedies before choosing to produce the play.
______
Courageous by Michael Healy opened on January 6 and ran until February 7, 2010 at the Tarragon Theatre, 30 Bridgman Ave. Toronto, Ontario. www.tarragontheatre.com.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
LETTERS TO MY GRANDMA TACKLES LARGE ISSUES THROUGH PRIVATE MEMORIES

Photo of Anusree Roy by Alex Felipe
The multicultural makeup of the Greater Toronto Area has been noted, studied and commented upon extensively. One of the less edifying features of multiculturalism is the habit of some of the immigrants bringing over, and the continuation of old country conflicts here. This feature tends to be more reprehensible when others do it. When one ethnic group marches on Ottawa to protest the treatment of its people in the old country, it considers its action as a rational exercise of democratic rights. When other groups fight their internecine battles in Canada some people are far less sympathetic and simply retort that you should not bring your ethnic differences here.
Landing in Canada, enjoying the material benefits that it so generously bestows (for those that can get them) and even acquiring Canadian citizenship does not sever immigrants from their roots. However one may wish that they will leave their political, sectarian and religious issues behind, it is impossible to accomplish. They are part of the essential being of the immigrant and they can not be abandoned upon landing at the airport.
The experiences and memories (some real, some borrowed) of the old country have become sources for works of literature and the theatre and Anusree Roy’s play Letters to My Grandma, now playing at Theatre Passe Muraille Backspace is a good example of the genre.
The play, a one-woman show with numerous characters played by the author, takes place in two worlds: the world of India of 1947 and today’s Canada. The connecting link is Malobee, a Canadian woman who on her wedding day opens some letters about her grandmother’s life in 1947 India.
Ethnic cleansing and movements of populations became almost commonplace in Europe in the 20th century. From the Armenians to the Pontians, to the Jews and more recent examples in the Balkans, mass killings of people hold few surprises for us. When Britain left British India in 1947, it partitioned it into two countries: India and Pakistan. What followed was religious violence on a massive scale that resulted in the deaths of some two million Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs. More than 12 million people were displaced (more than the entire population of Greece).
Roy has attempted quite successfully to capture the fear, the utter terror, the hatred and the horrors of events that are incomprehensible. The plump, bright-eyed Canadian Malobee is dressed in a traditional white dress and is getting married in Canada in 2009. She opens her grandmother’s letters that describe events of the past. The scene switches to 1947 India and humanity is reduced to fear, terror, horror, begging for survival and searching for pity. In a powerful performance, Roy switches from one character to the next as her grandmother tries to survive and escape from a world that is sheer hell.
The play is performed on an empty stage and director Thomas Morgan Jones brings out an emotionally charged production that is quite riveting.
Letters To My Grandma is classically Canadian in its reach from Canada to India, from the immigrant to her roots half way around the world. The immigrants’ roots, however disparate and different, may be what unite Canadians or at least provide points of connection in a country whose people often seem to have very little in common.
The play is only 45 minutes long and it needs to be expanded or perhaps combined with another short play to make a complete night at the theatre.
______
Letters to My Grandma by Anusree Roy opened on November 25 and ran until December 12, 2009 at Theatre Passe Muraille Backspace, 16 Ryerson Avenue, Toronto, Ontario. www.passemuraille.on.ca (416) 504-7529
Sunday, January 31, 2010
RESTORATION COMEDY IN BUFFALO – THE RELAPSE FROM THE IRISH CLASSICAL STAGE COMPANY

Leah Russo, center, as Berinthia, with the cast.
Photo: Gene Witkowski
You don’t get much Restoration Comedy these days.
When was the last time the Stratford Shakespeare Festival or The Canadian Stage Company produced a play by Congreve or a Wycherley? Use the fingers on both hands and look to your toes.
Soulpepper Theatre Company did stage Congreve’s The Way of the World in 2008 but they dropped any notion of maintaining the play’s cultural and linguistic milieu and went for an Ontario-accented comedy. It got us through the text but not without pain.
If you can’t get Restoration Comedy at home the only alternative is to go looking for it abroad. In this case I did not have to go much further than Buffalo, New York where the Irish Classical Stage Company has staged The Relapse by Sir John Vanbrugh.
The ICTC has been around since 1990 and puts on six productions a year. The plays seem well-chosen and broad-ranging. The list of productions over the years shows works by Moliere, O’Neill, Coward, Shaw, Wilde, Pinter, Sheridan and many others. Indeed an eclectic mix of plays.
The productions are put on at the Andrew Theatre in downtown Buffalo. It is an attractive theatre-in-the-round that holds 200 people.
The Relapse is a classic Restoration Comedy and was first produced in 1697. It is set against the rigid class structure of English society and the pursuit of money, marriage, sex and social status.
Sir Novelty Fashion purchased a peerage and now wants to marry the rich but déclassé Miss Hoyden. She is the daughter of the aptly named country bumpkin Sir Tunbelly Clumsey. The penniless brother, Young Fashion, will attempt to marry Miss Hoyden by pretending to be Sir Novelty.
Loveless, the happily married former rake goes to London with his lovely wife Amanda but becomes seriously attracted to her even lovelier cousin, the young widow Beritnthia. Add a matchmaker called Coupler, a chaplain and a few other worthies and you have a play of wit, high and low manners and ornate language that can be a delight to see.
Director Derek Campbell has decided to eschew the 17th century setting of the play with its fancy costumes, wigs, swords and manners and sets the play in the mid-1960’s. Vanbrugh wrote much of the play in verse and in the precise and brittle style of Restoration Comedy. By bringing the play into the 20th century, the Restoration set, costumes and paraphernalia are exchanged for modern dress, a few couches and coffee tables. Old wine can perhaps be put in a new bottle without changing the quality of its taste or the nuance of its aroma. Can you do the same with an old play?
We are in 20th century England listening to Restoration English, pronounced with an American accent producing tortured English accents and watching characters in modern dress behaving like 17th century rakes, fops, country bumpkins etc. How are we to appreciate the difference in class without the assistance of costume, manners and accent?
Not very easily. The obstacles that Campbell has set for himself and the actors are insurmountable. The crisp language of Restoration Comedy suffers the fatal double incongruity of being spoken in woeful accents in a milieu that has no relation to the original. In the Toronto production, there was no attempt at English accents and the result was equally awful. The attempts at an English accent in Buffalo ranged from the execrable to the completely inept. Not all of them tried. Robert Rutland as the country bumpkin Sir Tunbelly Clumsey lived up to his name but he sounded like an American bumpkin and not an English one. He looks like a natural comic but not in that role in this production.
The only other comet in the accent department goes to Mary Beth Lacki as Miss Hoyden, who manages to produce an accent suggestive of northern England. The actors do not so much deserve criticism as the comment that they are mostly in the wrong play. Vincent O’Neill, the Artistic Director of ICTC can do comedy and much else no doubt but as Sir Novelty he appeared to be striving for laughs without getting them. Chris Corporandy as Young Fashion, Gary Darling as Coupler and the others would have produced much better results in a play with a language that that they can pronounce.
The next production of the ICTC will be The Lonesome West by Martin McDonagh and it will run from February 26 to March 28, 2010.
The Relapse by Sir John Vanbrugh opened on January 15 and will run until February 14, 2010 at the Andrews Theatre, 625 Main Street, Buffalo, N.Y. www.irishclassicaltheatre.com
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
ALMOST PITCH-PERFECT HAY FEVER FROM ALUMNAE THEATRE
Judith Bliss (Dinah Watts) poses with her children Simon (Ken MacAlpine) and Sorel (Tamara Lubek) Photo by Joshua Meles
Noel Coward’s Hay Fever is an unlikely comedy. The Bliss family and their servant are spending a weekend at their country house in Berkshire. They are visited by four guests and nothing much happens. No one is murdered, there is no mystery to unravel or any plot to develop. Yet, Hay Fever, if done well, can be a very funny play. Ineptly done it is a monumental bore.
Alumnae Theatre Company gives the play a superb production, eliciting howls of laughter and providing a highly entertaining night at the theatre.
Coward provided lots the opportunities for a good director and cast to work with, however difficult it may seem. Judith Bliss (played to perfection by Dinah Watts) is a retired actress who is planning a comeback. Retired is a misnomer because she never stopped acting or taking theatrical poses on or off the stage. At one point Judith’s daughter Sorel (Tamara Lubek) tells her to “be natural” for a change. For the Bliss family being theatrical, self-absorbed and eccentric is being completely natural.
David (Hereward Pooley), the father who is a novelist and son Simon (Ken MacAlpine) complete the wacky Bliss family which gets some assistance in its bizarre conduct from their potty maid Clara (Anne Harper).
Each family member, unbeknownst to the others, invites a guest for the weekend. The guests become more like victims who need to plan and execute an escape after a night with the off-the-wall Blisses.
All the guests “fall in love” or are told they are in love or have a flirtation with one of the Blisses. Sandy (Leete Stetson) is cornered by Sorel and is caught kissing her in the library. Judith tells Richard (Jonathan Thomas) that she is in love with him and her husband must be informed immediately. The crafty Myra (Tina Sterling) tries to butter up David and they are caught kissing by Judith. The brainless Jackie (Kaitlyn Riordan) is supposed to be in love with Simon. That is a lot of activity for a play that has no plot and incidentally a lot of laughs.
The guests have become victims and the final act is a hilarious scene of them trying to escape from the Bliss house unseen. The self-absorbed Blisses get into an argument about the streets of Paris and the guests manage to escape behind their backs.
The play needs some astute and delicate handling. The lines are only funny if delivered properly. Each laugh depends on timing, delivery and the reaction of the recipients. Kudos to McDonald for orchestrating all and providing a fine production.
Dinah Watts leads the cast with a superb performance. She is allowed to overact, strike poses, gesture and modulate her voice. She does it impeccably. Pooley is hilarious as the somewhat disheveled novelist who finds himself accosted by an attractive woman. He and Sterling produce fine comedy.
The Bliss children are nothing if not theatrical and Lubek is especially good. Anne Harper’s maid was just what you would expect from a servant working for nutsos.
The English accents, so difficult to achieve at times, ranged from the acceptable to the excellent and the result was a very good night at the theatre.
______
Hay Fever by Noel Coward opened on January 15 and will run until January 30, 2010 at the Alumnae Theatre, 70 Berkeley Street, Toronto, Ontario. http://www.alumnaetheatre.com/. Telephone (416) 364-4170
Alumnae Theatre Company gives the play a superb production, eliciting howls of laughter and providing a highly entertaining night at the theatre.
Coward provided lots the opportunities for a good director and cast to work with, however difficult it may seem. Judith Bliss (played to perfection by Dinah Watts) is a retired actress who is planning a comeback. Retired is a misnomer because she never stopped acting or taking theatrical poses on or off the stage. At one point Judith’s daughter Sorel (Tamara Lubek) tells her to “be natural” for a change. For the Bliss family being theatrical, self-absorbed and eccentric is being completely natural.
David (Hereward Pooley), the father who is a novelist and son Simon (Ken MacAlpine) complete the wacky Bliss family which gets some assistance in its bizarre conduct from their potty maid Clara (Anne Harper).
Each family member, unbeknownst to the others, invites a guest for the weekend. The guests become more like victims who need to plan and execute an escape after a night with the off-the-wall Blisses.
All the guests “fall in love” or are told they are in love or have a flirtation with one of the Blisses. Sandy (Leete Stetson) is cornered by Sorel and is caught kissing her in the library. Judith tells Richard (Jonathan Thomas) that she is in love with him and her husband must be informed immediately. The crafty Myra (Tina Sterling) tries to butter up David and they are caught kissing by Judith. The brainless Jackie (Kaitlyn Riordan) is supposed to be in love with Simon. That is a lot of activity for a play that has no plot and incidentally a lot of laughs.
The guests have become victims and the final act is a hilarious scene of them trying to escape from the Bliss house unseen. The self-absorbed Blisses get into an argument about the streets of Paris and the guests manage to escape behind their backs.
The play needs some astute and delicate handling. The lines are only funny if delivered properly. Each laugh depends on timing, delivery and the reaction of the recipients. Kudos to McDonald for orchestrating all and providing a fine production.
Dinah Watts leads the cast with a superb performance. She is allowed to overact, strike poses, gesture and modulate her voice. She does it impeccably. Pooley is hilarious as the somewhat disheveled novelist who finds himself accosted by an attractive woman. He and Sterling produce fine comedy.
The Bliss children are nothing if not theatrical and Lubek is especially good. Anne Harper’s maid was just what you would expect from a servant working for nutsos.
The English accents, so difficult to achieve at times, ranged from the acceptable to the excellent and the result was a very good night at the theatre.
______
Hay Fever by Noel Coward opened on January 15 and will run until January 30, 2010 at the Alumnae Theatre, 70 Berkeley Street, Toronto, Ontario. http://www.alumnaetheatre.com/. Telephone (416) 364-4170
Thursday, January 21, 2010
SOULPEPPER THEATRE COMPANY IN 2009

THE YEAR IN REVIEW
By James Karas
jameskaras@rogers.com
The season for most theatre companies starts sometime in September and ends in May. Then the summer festivals take over until the fall. The same arrangement applies to schools and the end of vacations, of course, and some day the calendar year may begin on September 1.
Theatre companies in Toronto follow the September-May schedule except for Soulpepper Theatre Company which follows the calendar year for its season. As such the end of the year is the appropriate time to review what they did during 2009 and comment about their 2010 season.
There is little doubt that if you want to see good plays in Toronto, Soulpepper is your best bet in terms of repertory, number of plays and quality of production.
Soulpepper produced a hefty eleven plays during 2009. All were written in the twentieth century. Three were Canadian, three American, two English, two Hungarian and one French.
The season opened in February with Tom Stoppard’s Travesties, a brilliant and intricate play that features verbal pyrotechnics and requires acting with precision and finesse. Unfortunately, Soulpepper’s production fell short of what one would expect of them or would want to see in a Stoppard play.
The wide-ranging references to art, poetry and fiction and the lines from The Importance of Being Earnest that are interwoven in the dialogue of Travesties fell flat. The great speeches and witty lines failed almost completely to connect with the audience leaving one with a bad evening at the theatre.
The second production was American David Mamet’s classic outpouring of vitriol and obscenities, Glengarry Glen Ross. If nothing worked in Travesties, the opposite was true of Glengarry. It was a pitch-perfect production that happened to have connections to the current subprime mortgage mess created by American banks’ insatiable greed.
David Storch directed Eric Peterson, Peter Donaldson, Albert Schultz and William Webster through the orgy of immorality represented in the play. A riveting night at the theatre was the result.
With Joe Orton’s Loot we moved to a different type of morality completely. Joe Orton’s world is matter-of-factly amoral and vicious. The play opens with a woman in a coffin at centre stage. Her husband displays little emotion and is mostly concerned with the flowers while her son uses the coffin to stash away stolen cash.
The dialogue is like a sadistic Oscar Wilde and I am not sure if director Jim Warren captured all the blackness of the play but it was an enjoyable production none the less. Oliver Dennis, Nicole Underhay and Matthew Edison had the leading roles.
Clifford Odets’s Awake and Sing is set in the more familiar and congenial (for the audience) atmosphere of a working class apartment in New York in the 1930’s. It tells the story of a family (could be Greek, Polish or anything but in this case it is Jewish) that tries to make ends meet, maintain family traditions and morals in a new world and just survive. A moving production of the play’s several subplots with Nancy Palk’s powerful performance dominating the evening.
For its next production Soulpepper maintained a similar milieu. This time it was an immigrant family in Toronto in the 1970’s in David French’s Of the Fields, Lately, As in Awake and Sing this is a family drama in which a strong woman tries to effect reconciliation between her husband and her son. It is an emotionally charged play superbly directed by Ted Dykstra with marvelous performances by Diane D’Aquila, Kenneth Walsh, Eric Peterson and Jeff Lillico.
Billy Bishop Goes To War was the next production of the quintessentially Canadian play by John Gray and Eric Peterson. Bishop was the most highly-decorated Canadian war hero of World War I and the play about him has become the most frequently produced Canadian play. Ted Dykstra directed Peterson in the one-man show with Peterson paying some 20 characters. A planeload of kudos to Peterson and the production.
Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? presents a family drama of a different kind, to put it mildly. Two couples meet for drinks after a party at a New England college. They could treat us to witty repartee à la Neil Simon or they could launch vicious verbal warfare and cruel games. They do the latter as they examine and reveal not only their lives but by extension American history. Diana Leblanc directed Diego Matamoros and Nancy Palk in stellar performances.
A married couple engaged in verbal warfare is at the center of Ferenc Molnar’s The Guardsman but the atmosphere is one of hilarity rather than brutality. The warring couple are actors and the jealous husband (Albert Schultz) has to pretend he is his wife’s (Kristen Thomson) secret lover in order to win her back. There are several layers to the deception and perceptions of the play all adding up to a thoroughly enjoyable night at the theatre. Molnar was a Hungarian playwright and you don’t see too many plays from that part of the continent. Take it as an added bonus from Soulpepper.
The promise of moving away from twentieth century drama and offering a Greek tragedy, unfortunately did not materialize. The brochure containing the 2009 productions stated that we will get Sophocles’ Antigone. It was to be “in a new adaptation by Evan Webber with Chris Abraham” which is enough to send chills up your spine but, eh, it’s better than nothing.
We did not get even that. We had to settle for Jean Anouilh’s version of the myth as he saw it during the Nazi occupation of France.
Liisa Repo-Martell and R.H. Thomson did fine work in the leading roles of Antigone and Creon. But director Chris Abraham never brought the production to life and the whole thing was a big disappointment. Soulpepper can and should do more classics and move away from the twentieth century.
The penultimate production of the year was Parfumerie by Miklós László, another Hungarian playwright whom you do not run into every day. We are in the spirit of Christmas and a romantic comedy where love triumphs is de rigueur. Parfumerie tells the story of two people who do not get along at work but who are carrying on a passionate epistolary affair. We all know how that is going to end! Oliver Dennis and Patricia Fagan are the lovers and Joseph Ziegler is the humane owner of the shop where they work. Morris Panych directs the heart-warming comedy.
Production Number 11 for the year was Dennis Lee’s Civil Elegies. This was poetry recital combined with singing with piano accompaniment. There are a number of unusual elements to the event. It is based on a poem by Lee, who was Toronto’s first Poet Laureate. It is about Toronto and it consists entirely of verse. No doubt there are other plays based on poetry but I am not aware of one that combines all of the above.
The show was put together by Mike Ross (who also performs it) and Lorenzo Savoini. Albert Schultz directed. This is unusual fare and all we can do is encourage them to give us more.
In 2010, Soulpepper will produce twelve plays in what appears to be a more restricted repertoire. Canadian content is increased to four plays, the Americans and the English get three each and the Russians and the Irish one apiece. Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol and Ivan Turgenev’s A Month in the Country are the two non-twentieth century offerings.
Four of the productions are revivals: Billy Bishop Goes to War, Glengarry Glen Ross, A Raisin in the Sun and A Christmas Carol were all seen in the last couple of years. They are worthy productions but there are countless plays out there that could have been produced instead of regurgitating recent successes.
John Murrell’s Waiting for the Parade, David French’s Jitters, Sharon Pollock’s Doc are the other Canadian plays and although one can quibble about their choices one cannot mount a serious argument against them.
Oh What A Lovely War by Joan Littlewood, Theatre Workshop and Charles Chilton holds a lot of promise and may be an interestingly compared to Waiting for the Parade, another war-time play. Ivan Turgenev’s A Month in the Country was produced a couple of years ago at the Shaw Festival and we could have waited for a while longer for another staging. That was the Brian Friel version and we will have to see what Susan Coyne has in mind in her adaptation of the play.
Joe Orton’s What the Butler Saw, a dark comedy, is to be eagerly anticipated as it comes hot on the heels of Loot. I have never seen Sharon Pollock’s Doc nor Brian Friel’s Faith Healer and I can hardly say anything about those choices. Arthur Miler’s Death of a Salesman is a classic that can be seen repeatedly with profit.
I could do without the revivals but that’s because I am not Soulpepper’s Chief Financial Officer or fundraiser.
One can always wish for more or different plays but one can also be grateful for a company that started on a shoe string and provides the richest and most varied theatre in Toronto.
______
The 2010 season starts on January 22 with previous of Billy Bishop Goes To War. It opens on January 26, 2010 at the Young Centre for the Performing Arts, 55 Mill Street, Toronto, Ontario. For more information telephone (416) 866-8666 or go to http://www.soulpepper.ca/
By James Karas
jameskaras@rogers.com
The season for most theatre companies starts sometime in September and ends in May. Then the summer festivals take over until the fall. The same arrangement applies to schools and the end of vacations, of course, and some day the calendar year may begin on September 1.
Theatre companies in Toronto follow the September-May schedule except for Soulpepper Theatre Company which follows the calendar year for its season. As such the end of the year is the appropriate time to review what they did during 2009 and comment about their 2010 season.
There is little doubt that if you want to see good plays in Toronto, Soulpepper is your best bet in terms of repertory, number of plays and quality of production.
Soulpepper produced a hefty eleven plays during 2009. All were written in the twentieth century. Three were Canadian, three American, two English, two Hungarian and one French.
The season opened in February with Tom Stoppard’s Travesties, a brilliant and intricate play that features verbal pyrotechnics and requires acting with precision and finesse. Unfortunately, Soulpepper’s production fell short of what one would expect of them or would want to see in a Stoppard play.
The wide-ranging references to art, poetry and fiction and the lines from The Importance of Being Earnest that are interwoven in the dialogue of Travesties fell flat. The great speeches and witty lines failed almost completely to connect with the audience leaving one with a bad evening at the theatre.
The second production was American David Mamet’s classic outpouring of vitriol and obscenities, Glengarry Glen Ross. If nothing worked in Travesties, the opposite was true of Glengarry. It was a pitch-perfect production that happened to have connections to the current subprime mortgage mess created by American banks’ insatiable greed.
David Storch directed Eric Peterson, Peter Donaldson, Albert Schultz and William Webster through the orgy of immorality represented in the play. A riveting night at the theatre was the result.
With Joe Orton’s Loot we moved to a different type of morality completely. Joe Orton’s world is matter-of-factly amoral and vicious. The play opens with a woman in a coffin at centre stage. Her husband displays little emotion and is mostly concerned with the flowers while her son uses the coffin to stash away stolen cash.
The dialogue is like a sadistic Oscar Wilde and I am not sure if director Jim Warren captured all the blackness of the play but it was an enjoyable production none the less. Oliver Dennis, Nicole Underhay and Matthew Edison had the leading roles.
Clifford Odets’s Awake and Sing is set in the more familiar and congenial (for the audience) atmosphere of a working class apartment in New York in the 1930’s. It tells the story of a family (could be Greek, Polish or anything but in this case it is Jewish) that tries to make ends meet, maintain family traditions and morals in a new world and just survive. A moving production of the play’s several subplots with Nancy Palk’s powerful performance dominating the evening.
For its next production Soulpepper maintained a similar milieu. This time it was an immigrant family in Toronto in the 1970’s in David French’s Of the Fields, Lately, As in Awake and Sing this is a family drama in which a strong woman tries to effect reconciliation between her husband and her son. It is an emotionally charged play superbly directed by Ted Dykstra with marvelous performances by Diane D’Aquila, Kenneth Walsh, Eric Peterson and Jeff Lillico.
Billy Bishop Goes To War was the next production of the quintessentially Canadian play by John Gray and Eric Peterson. Bishop was the most highly-decorated Canadian war hero of World War I and the play about him has become the most frequently produced Canadian play. Ted Dykstra directed Peterson in the one-man show with Peterson paying some 20 characters. A planeload of kudos to Peterson and the production.
Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? presents a family drama of a different kind, to put it mildly. Two couples meet for drinks after a party at a New England college. They could treat us to witty repartee à la Neil Simon or they could launch vicious verbal warfare and cruel games. They do the latter as they examine and reveal not only their lives but by extension American history. Diana Leblanc directed Diego Matamoros and Nancy Palk in stellar performances.
A married couple engaged in verbal warfare is at the center of Ferenc Molnar’s The Guardsman but the atmosphere is one of hilarity rather than brutality. The warring couple are actors and the jealous husband (Albert Schultz) has to pretend he is his wife’s (Kristen Thomson) secret lover in order to win her back. There are several layers to the deception and perceptions of the play all adding up to a thoroughly enjoyable night at the theatre. Molnar was a Hungarian playwright and you don’t see too many plays from that part of the continent. Take it as an added bonus from Soulpepper.
The promise of moving away from twentieth century drama and offering a Greek tragedy, unfortunately did not materialize. The brochure containing the 2009 productions stated that we will get Sophocles’ Antigone. It was to be “in a new adaptation by Evan Webber with Chris Abraham” which is enough to send chills up your spine but, eh, it’s better than nothing.
We did not get even that. We had to settle for Jean Anouilh’s version of the myth as he saw it during the Nazi occupation of France.
Liisa Repo-Martell and R.H. Thomson did fine work in the leading roles of Antigone and Creon. But director Chris Abraham never brought the production to life and the whole thing was a big disappointment. Soulpepper can and should do more classics and move away from the twentieth century.
The penultimate production of the year was Parfumerie by Miklós László, another Hungarian playwright whom you do not run into every day. We are in the spirit of Christmas and a romantic comedy where love triumphs is de rigueur. Parfumerie tells the story of two people who do not get along at work but who are carrying on a passionate epistolary affair. We all know how that is going to end! Oliver Dennis and Patricia Fagan are the lovers and Joseph Ziegler is the humane owner of the shop where they work. Morris Panych directs the heart-warming comedy.
Production Number 11 for the year was Dennis Lee’s Civil Elegies. This was poetry recital combined with singing with piano accompaniment. There are a number of unusual elements to the event. It is based on a poem by Lee, who was Toronto’s first Poet Laureate. It is about Toronto and it consists entirely of verse. No doubt there are other plays based on poetry but I am not aware of one that combines all of the above.
The show was put together by Mike Ross (who also performs it) and Lorenzo Savoini. Albert Schultz directed. This is unusual fare and all we can do is encourage them to give us more.
In 2010, Soulpepper will produce twelve plays in what appears to be a more restricted repertoire. Canadian content is increased to four plays, the Americans and the English get three each and the Russians and the Irish one apiece. Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol and Ivan Turgenev’s A Month in the Country are the two non-twentieth century offerings.
Four of the productions are revivals: Billy Bishop Goes to War, Glengarry Glen Ross, A Raisin in the Sun and A Christmas Carol were all seen in the last couple of years. They are worthy productions but there are countless plays out there that could have been produced instead of regurgitating recent successes.
John Murrell’s Waiting for the Parade, David French’s Jitters, Sharon Pollock’s Doc are the other Canadian plays and although one can quibble about their choices one cannot mount a serious argument against them.
Oh What A Lovely War by Joan Littlewood, Theatre Workshop and Charles Chilton holds a lot of promise and may be an interestingly compared to Waiting for the Parade, another war-time play. Ivan Turgenev’s A Month in the Country was produced a couple of years ago at the Shaw Festival and we could have waited for a while longer for another staging. That was the Brian Friel version and we will have to see what Susan Coyne has in mind in her adaptation of the play.
Joe Orton’s What the Butler Saw, a dark comedy, is to be eagerly anticipated as it comes hot on the heels of Loot. I have never seen Sharon Pollock’s Doc nor Brian Friel’s Faith Healer and I can hardly say anything about those choices. Arthur Miler’s Death of a Salesman is a classic that can be seen repeatedly with profit.
I could do without the revivals but that’s because I am not Soulpepper’s Chief Financial Officer or fundraiser.
One can always wish for more or different plays but one can also be grateful for a company that started on a shoe string and provides the richest and most varied theatre in Toronto.
______
The 2010 season starts on January 22 with previous of Billy Bishop Goes To War. It opens on January 26, 2010 at the Young Centre for the Performing Arts, 55 Mill Street, Toronto, Ontario. For more information telephone (416) 866-8666 or go to http://www.soulpepper.ca/
(Photo: Kristen Thomson and Albert Schultz in The Guardsman)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
