I make no secret
of my excitement about seeing a play by Kazantzakis on stage, even an
adaptation of one of his great novels. The production, directed by Andrea Emmerton,
is done almost entirely by amateur actors, has numerous strengths and displays
some of the inevitable weaknesses of that acting pool.
Antonakes has
shaped a marvellous play from the complex novel. He takes the two intertwined
stories that happen in a fictional Turkish-occupied Greek village in Asia Minor
in 1923 to create a dramatic situation that leads to a catastrophic climax with
the inevitability of Greek tragedy.
The village
elders of Lykovrissi choose four men to enact the Passion of Christ. A simple
villager named Manolios (John Tokatlidis) is chosen to play Christ. Kostantes
(Tom Anastasios Haralambidis) is to play St. Peter and Michalis (Justin Borrow)
to play St. John. Panayotaros (Bill Chambers) is to play Judas Iscariot while
Katerina (Katerina Taxia), the village slut, plays Mary Magdalene. These five
are to prepare for a performance of the Passion at Easter.
The other plot
strand concerns arrival of some refugees from another village who seek the help
of the inhabitants of Lykovrissi. The two groups clash with the people of Lykovrissi
throwing out the refugees. The Christ-playing and Christ-like Manolios takes
the side of the refugee and the tragedy develops from there.
The play, as the
title makes clear, is deeply religious and especially
moral. It takes us back to the beginning of Christianity with reference not
only to the life of Christ but also to the lives of the first Christians who
lived in the catacombs. The life of the 20th century actors in the Passion
play, the villagers and the refugees have parallels with the life of Christ far
more intimate than a simple re-enactment of the Crucifixion.
The central
figure of the play is the Christ-figure Manolios. Tokatlidis plays Manolios as
a simple man who displays decency, faith, even fervour without being sanctimonious.
A well-balanced performance that does justice to the character.
Capetan
Fortounas is a likeable and sensible former sailor and member of the Village
Council. Peter Shipston exudes Fortounas’s humanity, decency and humour.
Fortounas is no great churchgoer, it seems, but when Manolios is excommunicated,
he is the only one that would light a candle for him.
Bill Chambers’
Judas seethes with violence and wildness as becomes the greatest betrayer in
history. The two priests play major roles in the play. The bad priest Father
Grigoris played by Pat Elia was unconvincing. He was clean-shaven with short hair
and that was the first mistake made by Emmerton. The visual incongruity was
accentuated by weak acting. This Father Grigoris was neither a firebrand zealot
nor a cunning cleric. He was low-keyed, almost business-like most of the time
and his evil was more to be assumed than seen and felt.
Father Fotis,
the good priest and leader of the refugees was more convincing physically but
again a better beard and longer hair would have enhanced his priestly appearance.
Tim Nasiopoulos looked quite the rebel and was good in the role.
Steve Kastoras
as Archon Patriarcheas was more petulant than strong. He should be a more
powerful character than Emmerton allows him to be. In fact, there is no commanding or domineering character in
the production at all.
Justin Barrow’s
Michalis was decent and devout and Haralambidis’s Kostantes was hen-pecked and
comical.
Special mention
is deserved by mezzo soprano Arianna Chris who was dressed in a beautiful,
traditional costume (most of the others wore peasant outfits) and sang a lovely
“Christos Anesti.” This is the Resurrection Hymn that one usually hears sung in
blissful cacophony by the mass of people in the church parking lot on Easter
Sunday.
Emmerton quite
properly allowed all of the actors to speak in their natural Ontario accents.
Most of the actors are non-Greek and you could tell who they were from the way they accented Greek names. The only one
who spoke with a pronounced accent was Sal Aquila as the Turkish Agha. This
Turkish overlord was more of a blusterer than a domineering conqueror.
The use of
microphones has become commonplace in the production of musicals and Emmerton
uses them in this production as well. The 631-seat Richmond Hill Centre seems
small enough to make the use of mikes unnecessary but one must assume that some
of the actors could not project their voices to the back of the theatre.
The advantage of
the use of mikes is that everyone can be heard clearly. The disadvantage is that
all voices come from a central speaker and you lose perspective of who is
speaking. The mikes add a note of artificiality to the performance that takes
away from the feel of live theatre.
Whatever the
criticisms, this was a significant production and a reminder that Kazantzakis’s
work for the theatre has been almost completely ignored. Antonakes’s successful
adaptation is highly producible and one can only hope that a professional company
will stage it. If the Stratford Shakespeare Festival can stage Austen, Dostoyevsky,
Dumas and Robertson Davies, surely it can do the same for Kazantzakis.
______
He Who Must Die by Michael Antonakes based on The Greek Passion by Nikos
Kazantzakis was performed six times between January 4 and 6, 2013 at the
Richmond Hill Centre for the Preforming Arts, 10268 Yonge St. Richmond Hill,
Ont. For more information go to http://www.HeWhoMustDie.com/
or 905-787-8811
No comments:
Post a Comment